Learning guide
Vocabulary homework your students will actually do
Every tutor knows the shape of this: the student met twenty words last week, and on Tuesday you spend the first ten minutes finding out that four of them survived. The lesson was fine. The week was empty.
This page is for teachers — private tutors, marketplace teachers, anyone who sets vocabulary between sessions — and it is about that week. It is written by LanguageRecap, so the last sections describe our own product.
The gap is between the lessons, not in them
A lesson produces vocabulary whether or not anyone writes it down: the words you corrected, the ones that came up in the exercise, the ones the student asked about twice. Most of it disappears because there is no cheap way to review it. The two usual options fail for the same reason:
- A word list on paper gets looked at once, if at all. Nothing schedules it.
- Telling the student to use a flashcard app transfers the work to them: build the cards, choose the format, keep it up after a long day. Most students stop in week two, and the ones who do not are the ones who needed it least.
The missing piece is not effort or motivation. It is the twenty minutes of card-building between the lesson and the first review.
What actually has to happen between lessons
Three things, in this order, and each one is where teachers lose students:
- Capture — the words have to come out of the lesson in a form the student keeps. Notes, a photo of the board, a screenshot of the exercise.
- Curation — someone has to decide which of those words are worth reviewing. Left alone, students keep the interesting ones and drop the useful ones.
- Recall on a schedule — the words have to come back at intervals, in a form that requires producing the answer rather than recognising it.
Step two is the one teachers are best at and the one that gets skipped, because doing it for a student means building their deck.
A workflow you can hand to a student in two minutes
This is how LanguageRecap is used in practice, written as instructions you can paste into a message:
- After the lesson, photograph the page or paste your notes into LanguageRecap and press import.
- The app proposes a word list with translations, a short story and quiz sentences. Delete what you do not need — this takes a minute and it is where your judgement matters.
- Save. Each word keeps the sentence it came from.
- Do the short recap it offers, then come back when it asks. Recaps are short by design: five minutes, not a study session.
The sentence a word arrives with is the part that makes this different from a word list. When the student reviews stendere, they see the sentence from the exercise you did together, not an example the app invented.
You can see the whole loop yourself in the read-only demo — a fixed Italian sample lesson, no account, nothing to install. It is the fastest way to judge whether the review experience is worth recommending, and it takes five minutes.
What this does not give you today
Being precise here saves us both a support email later.
- No student progress view. You cannot see what a student reviewed, how accurate they were, or whether they opened what you shared. That is a real gap for a tutor, and we would rather name it than let you discover it after recommending the app.
- No gradebook, deadlines or assignments. There is no due date to set and no report to export. Review happens on the student’s schedule, not a course calendar.
- Groups share content, not surveillance. A private group can hold a lesson that members adopt, and each member gets their own cards and their own schedule. What you hand over is the material; what you get back is nothing. The planned Tutor reporting is aggregate adoption, not a per-student feed.
- It is not a course. It does not decide what to teach next, does not grade pronunciation, and does not hold a conversation. It assumes the lesson already happened and you are the source of the material.
If a per-student progress view is what decides whether you use this with students, the honest answer today is no. The demo shows exactly what a student receives, with nothing hidden behind an account.
Where it fits in what you already do
The realistic pattern is a companion, not a replacement for your teaching or your materials: you teach, the student keeps the vocabulary, the app handles the return visits. It works best with students who already take regular lessons and who lose vocabulary between them — A2 and up, where the bottleneck is retention rather than first exposure.
Vocabulary review supports English, Italian, Spanish, French, German, Latvian and Swedish; conjugation review currently covers English and Italian. Italian is the deepest case today, which is also why the public demo is Italian.
What it costs for you and your students
Review is free for learners. A tutor pays for volume and teaching tools, and a student who joins a shared lesson pays nothing. The Tutor plan is shown at €24.99/month or €199/year; billing and the class tools are early access, not open yet.
Free
€0 forever
- Lesson imports
- 5 / month
- Best for
- Trying a few of your own lessons
Plus
€5.99 per month
or €49 / year
- Lesson imports
- 25 / month
- Best for
- A learner importing most lessons
Tutor
€24.99 per month
or €199 / year
- Lesson imports
- 120 / month
- Best for
- A tutor preparing lessons for students
Free review is available now. Import limits and the Plus/Tutor plans are planned early-access terms; billing is not open yet. Prices are in EUR; tax is shown at checkout. See the full pricing page.
Questions
Does my student have to pay?
No. Review and spaced repetition are free, and a student who joins a shared lesson does not need their own import allowance. A student who wants to import more of their own lessons can choose Plus at €5.99/month or €49/year once billing opens. See pricing for the current state.
Can I see whether they did the reviews?
No. There is no teacher-side per-student view. You will know it worked the way you know now: the vocabulary stops disappearing from their speech.
Does it work for beginners?
It works, but it is not where the value is. A beginner needs input and structure more than spaced review; the fit improves once the student has a lesson rhythm and a vocabulary backlog.
Is it AI?
One step, at import: notes go to Google Gemini, which proposes the vocabulary and example sentences, and the student approves or discards the result. Nothing calls a model during review, and there is no chatbot. The AI-tutor page states the boundary precisely, including the part that does not flatter us.
Which languages does it support?
English, Italian, Spanish, French, German, Latvian and Swedish, with conjugation review for English and Italian.
If you want to see how it compares with the tools students already use, the Quizlet comparison covers study sets and the app guide covers the wider categories.
LanguageRecap is not affiliated with any teaching marketplace mentioned on this site. Written November 2026.